I'm not sure what you're asking for — one is a .22 caliber, and the other is a .30 caliber. One is light, the other heavy (comparatively speaking). .50 BMG .300 Win. Mag. 7.62 Nato 7.62×39 5.56 NATO .22 LR Logistics?
Alpha Shooting Sports 7.62 x 39 upper: Bigger holes, better build – The AK-47 The AR-15 was developed with logistics in mind. That is, a pallet of 5.56×45 ammo weighs much less than a pallet of 30-06 or 7.62×51. If you ever want to start a heated debate, ask which.
This is assuming 5.56x45mm NATO vs. 7.62x51mm NATO ammunition. For military use: (this assumes a group of soldiers, standard logistics, and automatic weapons, extended engagements or patrols). 5.56mm is vastly lighter, both for the ammunition and the associated weapons system.
The 5.56×45 NATO cartridge is not a particularly devastating round.
our soldiers to carry approximately three times the ammunition by weight as the standard 7.62×51 NATO. Most states prohibit the.
India Buying 72,400 Assault Rifles From US Firm To Replace INSAS – US firm Sig Sauer will supply these 7.62×51 mm guns which are urgently required to replace the INSAS 5.56×45 mm rifles, the mainstay of Indian infantry troops. The purchase is being made under the.
Next US Military Rifle Cartridge: 6.5 Grendel, 6.8 SPC Rem, or back to 7.62 NATO? I was just looking up the characteristics of the recently developed Remington 6.8mm Special Purpose Cartridge and I like it a lot. Many rifles designed for the 5.56 NATO will handle it, making it attractive to.
Compared to larger calibers, proponents of the 5.56×45mm NATO round contend that animal studies of the wounding effects of the 5.56×45mm NATO round versus the 7.62×39mm have found that the 5.56×45mm NATO round is more damaging, due to the post-impact behavior of the 5.56 mm projectile resulting in greater cavitation of soft tissues.
When I was in the Marine Corps they showed us why taking good care of your sand bags was important. They filled 50 cal ammo cans with sand and shot them with an m16 and an m14, it only took one can to stop the 5.56 while it took two to stop the 7.62, add water and it took four cans to stop the 7.62. This was at close range though, about 25 yds.
See max range trajectory of 200gr 308 55gr 556 and 123gr wolf see fair use song state of the art.
Forget the AK-47: This Sig Sauer Rifle Might Be Better – This will mean that the Indian Army will field service rifles in three different calibers in the near future: 7.62×51 in the Sig, 7.62×39 in the AK, and 5.56×45 in the Caracal. But in the tender for.
The 7.62 NATO and .308 Winchester rounds are very close to identical with each that many people think that they can be used interchangeably. The main difference between the 7.62 NATO and .308 Winchester rounds is with which rifles you can use them. If you have a modern rifle that shoots .308.
Before we go much further, we want to address the oft-posed question "are the .308 Winchester and 7.62×51 NATO one and the same." The simple answer is no.
7.62 NATO vs .308 Winchester Ammo, What’s The Difference? Ammoland Inc. Posted on June 15, 2017 August 31, 2018 by Tom McHale. Gun nut, Tom McHale, risks a fight to explain the subtle nuances.
I haven't made a ballistics video in a while. 5.56/.223 Rifle Showdown! – SCAR 16S vs Bren 805 vs Tavor vs RDB vs ACR vs XCR vs FS2000 vs ARX 100 – Duration: 22:40. DoomsdayBrothers 407,339 views
7.62×51 has greater penetration & effectiveness at greater ranges at the cost of weight and recoil. 5.45×39 is an attempt to improve upon the 5.56×45. The longer bullet (nearly a full inch in length) has a hollow cavity under the tip moving the.
TriggerTimeTV shared a fantastic graphic showcasing the difference between the .308 and military-standard 7.62×51 cartridges. While some shooters understand that .308 (the civilian standard) is actually more powerful than its military cousin, few likely know the actual differences between the cartirdges.
Is This Sig Sauer Rifle Superior to the AK-47? – This will mean that the Indian Army will field service rifles in three different calibers in the near future: 7.62×51 in the Sig, 7.62×39 in the AK, and 5.56×45 in the Caracal. But in the tender for.
The 5.56×45mm NATO (official NATO nomenclature 5.56 NATO) is a rimless bottlenecked intermediate cartridge family developed in the late 1970s in Belgium by FN Herstal.
.223 Vs 5.56 Ammo Accuracy Ruger Precision Rifle Available in 5.56 NATO/.223 Rem – U.S.A. –-(Ammoland.com)-Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (NYSE: RGR) is pleased to introduce the Ruger Precision Rifle chambered in 5.56 NATO/.223 Rem. Delivering low recoil and exceptional accuracy. Here is a video on 223 and 556 ammo that i will be talking about i hope you enjoy
The 7.62×39 cartridge has a bad rap when it comes to long-range shooting ability, especially when compared to the lighter 5.56×45 rounds. In this section, we will use out ten selected rounds for our 5.56×45 vs 7.62×39 comparison and see if its reputation is supported by the data.
Tested: Springfield Saint Victor .308 Rifle – vs. .223 Rem., the former simply has more.
and cartridge options include not only 5.56×45 mm NATO/.223 Rem., but also .300 Blackout and now, as reviewed nearby, 7.62×51 mm NATO/.308 Win. In order.